<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>words</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2008-09-03:/words//12</id>
    <updated>2011-03-31T19:09:40Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.2-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Stephen Jesse Taylor</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2011/03/stephen-jesse-taylor-1.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2011:/words//12.749</id>

    <published>2011-03-31T18:54:35Z</published>
    <updated>2011-03-31T19:09:40Z</updated>

    <summary>an old dream &quot;My Ten-Year-Old Mother&quot;I had a dream once, before I was a teenager, that my mother turned into a ten-year-old girl right before my eyes. I saw her through a keyhole, on the edge of a place I wasn&apos;t allowed to go. Suddenly, she motioned to me, to follow her up a dusty stairwell, to go find hidden objects in the attic that beckoned to us both. We were about the same age then, my mother and me, the year of the dream somewhere around 1990 but set back in time around 1960.We were in the place she...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<h1 id="title_div5521519155" class="photo-title"><font style="font-size: 1.95312em;">an old dream</font></h1><br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Stephen Jesse Taylor .jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/stephen_jesse_taylor/Stephen%20Jesse%20Taylor%20.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="500" /></span><br /><br /> <div><p id="yui_3_3_0_1_13015974765201007">"My Ten-Year-Old Mother"</p><p>I 
had a dream once, before I was a teenager, that my mother turned into a 
ten-year-old girl right before my eyes.  I saw her through a keyhole, on
 the edge of a place I wasn't allowed to go.  Suddenly, she motioned to 
me, to follow her up a dusty stairwell, to go find hidden objects in the
 attic that beckoned to us both.  We were about the same age then, my 
mother and me, the year of the dream somewhere around 1990 but set back 
in time around 1960.</p><p>We were in the place she had grown up in, an 
old house next to some railroad tracks in southern Indiana.  Every night
 I ever stayed there, trains came through and woke me up in my sleep, 
and I'm sure this dream was full of the sound of wheels clunking on 
steel, at night, right outside the window.  The house was huge and built
 just after the Civil War by my mother's people, North Carolina Quakers 
and Irish coalminers.  Like so many of those old houses, especially the 
bigger ones, the twisting corridor leading upstairs was shut off by 
doors on both ends, mostly to prevent a draft, but after decades of 
disuse, to effectively close off the past and let the things stored 
there gather the dust they needed to be important to us again.</p><p>I 
was bored and poking around the house that day, the day I had the dream.
  I tried to open the door and go upstairs, where my grandmother warned 
us never to go.  She caught me.  I tried again.  She got annoyed and 
told my brother and me to sit down at the dinner table (my somewhat 
Southern, part-Indian grandmother, named Virginia after the state, a 
trace of the old accent surviving on her breath).  She had lost most of 
her toes to diabetes, so she scared us by taking off her socks and 
showing us her feet, telling us not to walk upstairs where she couldn't 
go after us, and to have pity on an old woman.  (When she died, her two 
surviving toes poked out from underneath the sheet on the hospital bed 
in a funny Churchill-like flourish, a sign, we thought, of victory and 
peace).  Then, after she'd scolded us, she gave us chocolate milk and 
told us both to go outside and play.</p><p>That night, I think, was when
 I dreamed about my mother walking up those steps.  She was ten, then, 
and beckoned to me through the keyhole to open that door, against my 
grandmother's wishes.  She had pigtails, a big gap in her teeth, and 
wore a polka-dotted dress, pure 1950's elementary school fashion.  She 
could have won a part in <i>To Kill A Mockingbird</i> with Gregory Peck.
  (In my dream, something about the whole house became residual and Deep
 Southern.)  Looking through the keyhole, I saw my ten-year-old mother 
all in black and white, her hands motioning me to turn the knob and come
 see what was up there, to not worry, that she would be my mother one 
day and approved of this adventure.</p><p>I turned the doorknob.  She 
walked around the bend in the stairs at the bottom of the landing, just 
as I came through the doorway, then went on ahead of me.  I looked up.  
She stood there at the top, keeping away from me, silhouetted against an
 overexposed background.  I climbed the dusty, dirty stairs, she 
disappeared behind a closed door, and I found a basketful of old 
black-and-white photographs where she had been standing.  For a second, I
 thought she had become the photographs.  Then I looked through another 
keyhole.  She was in her room, writing or drawing something with a 
crayon on paper, delicately and dreamily, I thought, not looking at me 
anymore.  I had no idea what she was drawing, but the image of her was 
so intense, I woke up right away.</p><p>A year or two later, when my grandmother died (I was about thirteen then), I found out what that drawing was.</p><p>I
 remember nothing directly about my grandfather.  He died when I was 
three.  He was a sign-painter and postmaster, a talented small-town 
Midwestern artist.  Though he was too old to be a fighting soldier 
during World War II, he painted U.S. and British warplanes in New Guinea
 and Australia.  I think he became a religious man only after the war, 
when he came back to Indiana and married my Baptist grandmother (a 
pleasant but, as my mother remembers, less humorous person than her 
husband Gerald).  During the war, he kept an address book of Australian 
girls he was fooling around with and probably could have married.  He 
brought back two lockets holding photographs of one of them.  In New 
Guinea and the Philippines, photographs show him painting pictures of 
buxom, flirtatious, blond nurses, the propaganda of their breasts 
somehow reminding soldiers to "take their atabrin" and quinine, 
treatment he ended up taking for the rest of his life after contracting 
malaria in New Guinea.</p><p>His family had been Quakers from Carolina, 
big-eared blacksmiths, ruddy long-nosed square-jawed carpenters, people 
who worked with their hands.  So did he.  One evening around 1960, I 
guess, he sat my mother against a windowsill in Indiana, put his hand on
 her chin and tilted it down a ways, told her to close her eyes, then 
picked up a charcoal pencil and started to draw.  In the picture he 
made, she had pigtails and was wearing a polka-dotted dress, a 
mischievous, happy girl lost for a moment in reverie.  My grandfather 
was a funny man, but I think he must have been immensely thoughtful, 
too, having lost his father at age thirteen, at the height of the Great 
Depression, to a coal mine, and his own thirteen-year-old son to 
sickness, on his birthday.  I wonder if he didn't make a portrait of my 
mother after her brother died, to console her.</p><p>I never saw the 
image until a few years after the dream, when we were cleaning out the 
old house, getting ready to sell it out of the family for the first time
 since it was built in the 1870's.  Upstairs, my parents found old 
tintypes of the blacksmith I was named for (we had never seen his face),
 <a href="http://www.fluidr.com/photos/staylor336/sets/72157625810240437" rel="nofollow">hundreds of black-and-white photographs</a>
 in baskets, crayon drawings, enough napkins and stamps to buy a car or 
pay for a funeral, silver coins from Australia with Queen Victoria and 
George V on them, a machete brought back from the South Pacific, a 
"safari hat," lewd pictures of Filipino tribeswomen.  Then, in what had 
once been her bedroom in the attic, my mother tore a tacky picture out 
of a tacky frame and discovered a beautiful hand-made drawing of herself
 stuffed in behind it, signed by her father and used as matting.  She 
blacked out and almost fell down the stairs.</p><p>Just as I had dreamed it, a ten-year-old girl had been hiding in the attic all along.</p><p><br /></p><p>A story and photograph by <a href="http://www.sjtaylorphoto.net/">Stephen Jesse Taylor</a> (USA) ©2011</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><b><span class="caps"><span class="caps">COPYRIGHT NOTICE</span> </span></b></font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><br />Copyright















 © Stephen Jesse Taylor&nbsp; . All rights reserved. This photo is not to be <br />
used as free&nbsp; stock.&nbsp; Use without written consent by the author (Stephen Jesse Taylor) is&nbsp; <br />
illegal and punishable by law</font></p><p><br /></p><br /><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Stephen Jesse Taylor</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2011/02/stephen-jesse-taylor.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2011:/words//12.731</id>

    <published>2011-02-25T17:02:49Z</published>
    <updated>2011-02-25T17:23:50Z</updated>

    <summary>oh lovely rockfor lawrence hasselman, who believed he was being pestered by a witch, 1930-1934: at the devil&apos;s backbone, montgomery county, indianaThe Pine Hills gorge is a small but jaw-droppingly steep canyon, twelve miles southwest of Crawfordsville, Indiana, that forms part of one of the weirdest landscapes in the Midwest. The gorge, and the Sugar Creek Valley as a whole, is so unusual compared to the wider landscape of cornfields and soybeans surrounding it that it seems like something from much farther north or west. Carved by a series of creeks from ancient layers of Mansfield and Borden sandstone, the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<b><font style="font-size: 1.95312em;">oh lovely rock</font></b><br /><div><br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="olrock.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/stephen_jesse_taylor/olrock.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="500" /></span><br /><br /><br /><br /><b><font style="font-size: 1.95312em;">for lawrence hasselman, who believed he was being pestered by a witch, 1930-1934: <br />at the devil's backbone, montgomery county, indiana</font></b><br /><br /><br /><p id="yui_3_3_0_1_12986525863791234">The Pine Hills gorge is a small 
but jaw-droppingly steep canyon, twelve miles southwest of 
Crawfordsville, Indiana, that forms part of one of the weirdest 
landscapes in the Midwest.  The gorge, and the Sugar Creek Valley as a 
whole, is so unusual compared to the wider landscape of cornfields and 
soybeans surrounding it that it seems like something from much farther 
north or west.  Carved by a series of creeks from ancient layers of 
Mansfield and Borden sandstone, the gullies and small canyons that dot 
the area are astonishingly beautiful.  But the beauty of sandstone is a 
weird, challenging beauty.</p><p>The sandstone itself was a byproduct of
 the fossils and plant matter left off here a few million years ago, 
when Indiana formed part of the ocean bed.  The glaciers that later 
flattened about half of the state left this spot mostly untouched, 
though surrounding land was scoured almost featureless.  The gorge is a 
place shaped more by water, alternately violent and gentle, than by the 
mammoth brutality of the great ice sheets.</p><p>Its stony soil is 
mostly unsuitable for deciduous trees.  What grows here instead is what 
botanists calls a "relic colony," the only stand of white pines in 
Indiana, located so far south of the normal limits of this species that 
the sight of them is a sweet jolt to the eye.  The typical experience of
 walking in the mostly deciduous Indiana forests (beautiful as they are)
 during the winter is one of silence, or the crunch of boots underfoot. 
 At Pine Hills, among evergreens, the air is alive with the sound of 
wind and water.  The water-carved landscape is literally <i>beneath</i> 
the horizon of monotonous row crops that characterizes most of central 
Indiana.  But that fact alone is one of the beauties of Midwestern 
landscape, where topographical variation is often underneath the 
ordinary line of vision, down toward sea level and the world of water, 
in gullies and creek beds and drainage ditches, coming into and leaving 
human vision in a flash as we shoot across the landscape in a car, or in
 the case of caves, remaining completely hidden until they are sought 
out.</p><p>The sandstone gorges along Indian and Sugar Creeks are 
steeped in unusual folklore and history, inspired by the fear and awe 
this place has evoked for hundreds of years.  It is the only landscape I
 know of within an hour's drive of where I live that exemplifies what 
the aesthetic philosopher Edmund Burke said about "sublimity":  whereas 
the picturesque is just pretty and the beautiful is only uplifting, the 
sublime is powerful because it has the capacity to literally kill you, 
to draw you out of yourself and toss you into in true mystery.  The 
Romantic poets Hoelderlin and Novalis and Shelley went crazy not because
 of beauty, but because they stepped across an indefinable line into 
sublimity, which pulled them out of themselves and threw them into 
shadier territory, where they stopped functioning as "normal" human 
beings and came into contact with something dangerous, even maddening, 
possibly fatal, far beyond mere beauty, which bored them.  The word 
sublime has lost that older meaning it had for the Romantics.  Its 
etymology notwithstanding, it no longer gives a sense of being "on the 
edge of things," in a borderland, at the gateway to difficult, 
challenging and unknown spiritual terrain.  Though both might be full of
 wonder, a frightening cave is sublime, a cupcake is not.  These 
photographs are about the meaning of "sublimity," and about one place 
where I felt some inkling of the sublime.</p><p>When the pioneers first 
came into the sandstone bluff country in the Sugar Creek Valley in the 
1820's (not that long ago), they called the area around the gorge on 
Indian Creek by an old place name, probably derived from the Miami 
Indians:  "The Shades of Death."  The Miami had lived here for 
generations, and at some point in their history, before Europeans came, 
they fought a horrific losing battle in this gorge or in the woods 
around it.  Of six-hundred Miami warriors, all but twenty were 
slaughtered.</p><p>The forest was a "black forest" then, pure 
old-growth, so thick and deep that light barely touched the ground.  To 
newcomers, used to fields and clear-cuts and towns, it would have been a
 frightening and bizarre place.  But some people found it homey.  An 
Irish immigrant, Alexander Weir, who came here around 1820, bought land 
on Sugar Creek because it reminded him of the rough, stony country of 
County Galway on the west coast of Ireland, where he was from.  For 
years, a large tract of land in southwestern Montgomery County was 
actually known as "Bally Hitch", after Weir's birthplace, an Irish 
village called Ballynahinch.</p><p>The first federal land surveyors 
described the area as "broken country," third-rate land, mostly 
unsuitable for farming, but a few settlers ventured onto it because it 
was so cheap.  Around 1830, a murder took place in an isolated cabin 
near the Indian Creek gorge.  A woman known only as "Mrs. Rush" got 
tired of her husband's brutality toward her.  One night, while he slept,
 she stuck a hatchet through his skull.  An all-male jury in 
Crawfordsville, twelve miles away, acquitted her of murder, even though 
they knew she was guilty, and the judge actually commended her action.  
But grisly stories about deeds done at "The Shades of Death" apparently 
helped keep people away from the area for years.</p><p>In 1911, two 
unusual brothers, Frank and Lawrence Hasselman, came here and began to 
buy up land around the gorge.  The Hasselman brothers were city people 
from Indianapolis and had been given a good education, growing up in 
Indiana when it had more writers per capita than any state but New York.
  Though they were native Hoosiers, they were the grandsons of James 
Blood, the first mayor of Lawrence, Kansas, who had once crossed paths 
with the mad abolitionist John Brown when Brown was decapitating his 
enemies in "Bleeding Kansas" on the eve of the Civil War.  Their mother,
 Ida Blood, was one of the first female graduates of the University of 
Kansas and her son Lawrence Hasselman was probably named after the town.</p><p>But
 as many Hoosier stories go, things that began well ended in tragedy and
 madness.  Frank and Lawrence opened a dance hall and campground on 
Sugar Creek, next to the Deer's Mill covered bridge.  Between 1911 and 
the mid-1920's, the Hasselman brothers purchased all the land around the
 gorge on Indian Creek, which they operated as a private park called 
Pine Hills.  They led tour groups, picnickers from Indianapolis, and 
botanists and geologists on hiking trips into the canyon, to see the 
white pines and extraordinary rock features like "The Slide," Honeycomb 
Rock, and three high sandstone "backbones" (one named for the devil, one
 for a turkey, one for an abandoned mill).  Tourists carved portraits of
 the devil into the six-foot-wide backbone that bears his name, 
alongside a carving of a passenger pigeon, a species that once darkened 
North American skies for hours but lives on here only in stone.  The 
Hasselmans started an experimental farm on the edge of the property 
(both brothers had degrees in science), and part of the land briefly 
became a state agricultural experiment station.  Some of the trees were 
logged.  The whole character of the place began to change.</p><p>Then 
Frank died in 1924.  Lawrence, who was described as a "cultured, 
educated gentleman" but the less sociable and talkative of the two 
brothers, closed the park to visitors.  He went off to live alone in a 
cabin in the woods, reveling in the isolation of the place.  Apparently 
he dabbled in spiritualism, a common fad in the 1920s, when even 
well-educated people like the poet William Butler Yeats were trying to 
dig deep into life's mysteries with the help of "mediums" and 
alternative spirituality.  Whether Lawrence Hasselman actually went 
insane is not clear, but stories began to go around the neighborhood 
that there was a mad hermit living in the hills next to the gorge.  
Between 1930 and 1934, according to one story, "the hermit of Pine 
Hills" believed he was being pestered by a malevolent witch, who lived 
somewhere back in the sandstone gullies and came out to walk in "The 
Shades of Death" and mess around with Lawrence Hasselman, who had 
brought people into the place.  Hasselman lived here until 1937.  
Concerned family members finally took him away.  They sent him to the 
Central State Hospital, an Indianapolis mental asylum known as the 
"Seven Steeples."  He died there in August 1950, far away from his home 
next to the gorge.</p><p>The only real witch in the hills, of course, is
 water.  The sight and sound of it are truly a force of magic.  It is 
hard to imagine that a man who lived here permanently would not have 
been affected and transformed by it, slowly but completely, in the same 
way that ancient layers of sandstone, the fallout of old oceanic life, 
have been shaped into remarkable, breathtaking landforms by the coaxing 
power of the creek.  What the Miami and the pioneers called "The Shades 
of Death" became a state park in the 1960's and was given the 
family-friendly name "Shades" (Pine Hills is a remote nature preserve 
next to the park), but the force of the sublime still lingers on here, 
greater than mere beauty.  Amid the susurration of white pines and the 
rush of snow-melt on a warm February day, I felt a power leading me into
 something deeper than beauty, something more truly surprising and 
interesting and complex, jolting and seductive at the same time.  It is 
something difficult to encompass on film or to accurately express with 
words, but it needed a tragic story and some tentative photographs from 
experience to convey.</p><p><br /></p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="olrock2.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/stephen_jesse_taylor/olrock2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="500" /></span><p><br /></p>by: <a href="http://www.fluidr.com/photos/staylor336/sets">Stephen Jesse Taylor</a>&nbsp; (USA)&nbsp; ©2011<br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><i>top photo: Yashica Mat, Ilford Pan F<br />bottom photo: Holga 120, Tri-X 400</i></font><br /><br /><a href="http://www.fluidr.com/photos/staylor336/sets/72157625123887487">Oh Lovely Rock</a> (set on Flickr)<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><b><span class="caps"><span class="caps">COPYRIGHT NOTICE</span> </span></b></font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><br />Copyright















 © Stephen Jesse Taylor&nbsp; . All rights reserved. This photo is not to be <br />
used as free&nbsp; stock.&nbsp; Use without written consent by the author (Stephen Jesse Taylor) is&nbsp; <br />
illegal and punishable by law</font><br /><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The company of silence made it easier to be so alone</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2010/12/the-company-of-silence-made-it-easier-to-be-so-alone.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2010:/words//12.692</id>

    <published>2010-12-10T09:34:07Z</published>
    <updated>2010-12-10T09:45:51Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ Those that know me well know that a major pet peeve of mine is the overuse and misuse of the term "fine art photographer".&nbsp; If you have spent much time with me, you have heard a rant or two about this. Well it still peeves me, but I am not going to rant tonight. I do want to talk about the use of this term and what it means, and why I believe, if you are an upcoming photographer you should avoid using it. Granted, what I have to share is all just my opinion, but I think that...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="zebdecember2010.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/zebdecember2010.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="333" width="500" /></span> <div><br /><br /><br /><div id="description_div5236687275" class="photo-desc"><p id="yui_3_2_0_1_12919732632781178">Those
 that know me well know that a major pet peeve of mine is the overuse 
and misuse of the term "fine art photographer".&nbsp;  If you have spent 
much time with me, you have heard a rant or two about this. <br /></p><p>Well it still peeves me, but I am not going to 
rant tonight.  I do want to talk about the use of this term and what it 
means, and why I believe, if you are an upcoming photographer you should
 avoid using it.  Granted, what I have to share is all just my opinion, 
but I think that I have a few decent opinions on the subject.  And 
before I even get started, I want to mention that there was a time I 
labeled my work as "fine art".  So if you feel defensive or offended by 
anything I have to say on the subject, well you are in good company, at 
least I think you are.  And if that doesn't help you feel better, then 
you have larger problems than I am able to solve without several years 
of advance schooling.</p><p>Let me start briefly by looking at the term 
itself.  Let's break it down for a moment and just look at the "art" 
portion.  I have had this discussion before regarding what is art, so I 
am not going to repeat familiar ground.  Basically, most all photography
 can be artistic, but not all of it always is artistic.  I think 
artistic is an intent and not inherent.  I think a photographer with an 
artistic intent tries to do many different things from capturing their 
unique relationship with their subject matter to expressing ideas that 
are new and bold, to moving large portions of the population emotionally
 for a specific goal, etc.  All that aside, artistic intent endeavors 
toward the unique and different.  Now the slight monkey wrench to this 
equation is pop art, which actually doesn't seem to trend toward 
different at all, I guess, at least not how we think of pop art today.  
Without bothering to try and pin down exactly what art is though, we can
 at least sketch a general idea.  Going out and taking landscape 
photographers is not inherently artistic, though it can be approached in
 an artistic fashion.  </p><p>So add in "fine" now.  Fine seems to imply
 some degree of excellence or mastery, a level higher than normal.  I 
think of fine art and I think basically of artistic genius, an artist or
 their work that revolutionizes how I see the world or perceive it.  
This to me is fine art.  The pinnacle of artistic endeavor.  Got me so 
far?</p><p>A big problem with using the term on yourself though is that 
generally you have not reached this pinnacle, you are usually still 
climbing.  At least you should be.  It may seem a harmless enough thing 
to tack on a few extra words to preface your work, but careless use of 
those same words can start to change your own perception of yourself.  
You begin to think of yourself as a fine art photographer with all the 
(self-alluded) connotations of greatness that carries.  I think this is 
dangerous as it builds a bias in the photographer toward their own work 
that may actually hinder their ability to grow further and to receive 
criticism openly.  In my personal experience, the photographers I know 
who have had the most trouble taking critiques of their work seriously 
generally label themselves as fine art photographers.  Coincidence?  
Perhaps, perhaps not.</p><p>That is all sort of an aside though, and 
honestly I have begun with my weakest argument.  Let me lay out my 
second.  The term is horribly overused today, and hence has become 
diluted at best and at worst has a negative connotation of pompousness 
and arrogance.  Go pick up a photography magazine and flip through the 
ads in the back for photographers.  Each of them calls themselves fine 
art photographers.  Venture through your peers' websites and take note 
of how many use the term on themselves.  You, me, grandma, grandma's 
half-sister Berta, heck even the dog has begun styling himself a fine 
art landscape photographer who does fine art nudes on the side when he 
isn't booked to shoot a fine art wedding album.  I have to restrain an 
urge to roll my eyes when I hear photographers describing themselves as 
fine art, and inwardly I think "Oh, great.  Another one of THESE."  Now,
 I try to approach all work as openly as I can, but again, the point is 
the misuse of the term for me has actually created a handicap in 
appreciating what a photographer is doing.  That is unless I am looking 
at your work in MOMA or I have five of your books in front of me checked
 out from the library representing 30 years of work.  In that case I am 
not turned off by the use of the term.  I do believe it is an earn-able 
and deserving title for some.  </p><p>But I do wonder about this 
backlash in public opinion, sort of like how HDR became really really 
popular and then got so overused that many photographers actually 
started to scorn its use and take it less seriously.  I wonder if the 
same will prove to be true of the use of "fine art photography".</p><p>And
 lastly, my best argument against using the term to describe yourself.  I
 know a lot of photographers use it because everyone else seems to be, 
and it just seems like the thing to do if you are a serious 
photographer.  The old, "Everyone else is doing it, so why shouldn't I?"
 mentality.  Well, that is exactly why you DON'T.  </p><p>Look at it this way.  </p><p>Today's
 photographic world is incredibly saturated.  Photographers number in 
the millions.  Photographs in the, what, trillions?  Quadrillions?  
Quintuplezillions?  It is difficult to make much headway as a lone 
photographer in terms of commercial success.  So you look for every 
advantage you can find to make yourself stand out.  That is the point 
right?  To stand out so you are noticed.  Well why do you want to do 
what everyone else is doing then?  That just makes you another face in 
the crowd, hardly the way to stand out.  Now, you can stand out in two 
different ways.  You can do what everyone else is to such a degree of 
excellence that you raise yourself above them.  This is the route that 
most photographers try to take because it is the most obvious.  If I can
 just take better and better photos, the world will have to notice me.  
The problem with this approach is again, this is the route that most of 
your competition is trying to take as well, to get better and better so 
their greatness has to be noticed.  But up is not the only possible 
direction.  You can also stand apart from the crowd too.  You can do 
something entirely different than everyone else as well.  Something 
unique.  Now, this is probably the trickier route, but it isn't as hard 
as many imagine.  Imagination is a skill that gets better with practice.
  </p><p>The irony here is that many photographers use the term "fine 
art" as a marketing scheme, a manner of labeling their work in a way 
familiar to the public.  It doesn't actually have much to do with their 
abilities with a camera, but their attempts to make their photographs 
seem more valuable.  Except by calling their work the same thing as 
every other photographer with a website, they throw their lot right in 
with the crowd and hope that luck and chance shake them out in front of 
someone who cares.  And so as a marketing scheme, I think it is a poor 
one.  It seems like a better idea to find a more creative (and being 
extremely creative is what fine artists are supposed to be doing anyway)
 way of packaging and presenting your work to the public, a way that 
stands out and is memorable, not that chameleons in with all the other 
fine art photography out there. </p><p>Because honestly, take a look 
around you.  What does that term even mean any more?  Not a whole lot.  
So if it means so little, why do you want to attach it to your own work?
  Doesn't your photography mean more to you to not label it so cheaply?</p><p>It
 really should.  But then, this is just my opinion.  Art is subjective 
after all, just remember to keep some perspective on hand when you can 
muster it.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>By: <a href="http://www.zebandrews.com/">Zeb Andrews</a> (USA)</p><p><br /></p><p><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><i>Photo:&nbsp; Pentax 6x7</i></font></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Copyright ©Zeb Andrews , All rights 
reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock. <br />Use without 
written consent by the author (</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Zeb Andrews</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"> ) is illegal and punishable 
by law.</font></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><br /></font></p></div><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Learning to color outside the lines</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2010/11/learning-to-color-outside-the-lines.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2010:/words//12.673</id>

    <published>2010-11-16T07:33:36Z</published>
    <updated>2010-11-16T07:37:43Z</updated>

    <summary> Learning to color outside the linesI admit, some of my thoughts and feelings on photography seem contradictory. I wanted to spend the evening discussing the importance of shutter speeds and apertures, yet I feel a certain hesitation to seem to put too much importance on such technicals. I firmly believe having a technical proficiency with cameras and photography in general to be very important towards the process of becoming a &quot;good&quot; photography. But at the same time, I think part of that process includes learning the technical side of photography, not so much as to know when to use...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="zeb2010.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/zeb/zeb2010.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="483" /></span> <div><br /><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;">Learning to color outside the lines</font><br /><br /><br />I admit, some of my thoughts and feelings on photography seem contradictory. I wanted to spend the evening discussing the importance of shutter speeds and apertures, yet I feel a certain hesitation to seem to put too much importance on such technicals. I firmly believe having a technical proficiency with cameras and photography in general to be very important towards the process of becoming a "good" photography. But at the same time, I think part of that process includes learning the technical side of photography, not so much as to know when to use it properly but rather to know when to set it all aside. See, I believe technical knowledge certainly aids the making of technically strong photographs, but developing too much reliance on shutter speeds, apertures, focus, exposure, etc is also extremely limiting in the making of creative photography.<br /><br />There is a balance to be found here, and it is not an easy one. I once heard this summed up quite succinctly by a fellow photographer who said that "a great photograph is a balance between subject and style". Think about that for a moment and then think about how little photography that you know really exhibits this balance, and it is mostly done by people named Bresson, Capa, Adams, Rowell, Morell, Koudelka, etc.<br /><br />Anyway, back to technicals and contradictions. I had an experience recently with a student whose photography teacher was declaring that they were not going to teach shutter speeds and apertures any more because all cameras these days had an auto function and LCD screens making an understanding of shutter and apertures pointless. This didn't sit well with me. I think understanding what your camera is doing is incredibly vital to the photographic process. I mean, if you don't what are you doing? Simply holding your camera at arm's length and crossing your fingers and trusting that what the camera brings back is what you hope it will? This is a tad harsh, I know. But then again, most people reading this have that understanding of shutters and apertures. But if there is a trend starting that results in photographers in 20 years not knowing what a shutter is, or an aperture, well I am sure there will be good photography out there, but I ... I don't know, like I said it just doesn't sit well with me.<br /><br />But then again, I think it is limiting when a photographer thinks technicals are everything. I mean in a sense they are, but in a much more amorphous way than we realize. Take shutter speeds, apertures and this image for example. My shutter was about 1/4th of a second, the aperture something sufficient to achieve that slow enough shutter speed so I could pan back and forth. This image was the result. It would have been ok for me to have stood there and have thought "Ok, I need to make this 1/60th of a second or higher if I am going to hand-hold or my photo is going to be blurry, that or I need to get this on a tripod or I won't get a crisp photo." Had I done that I am sure I would still have taken a beautiful photograph, a very different one, but still beautiful. But instead I fudged the rules, and found this instead. And that is sort of my point, as much of one as I seem to be making tonight. You need to learn that technical proficiency but be able to get to a point where you realize it's limits are just highlighting new areas to explore, because if you stick to just the "rules" your photography will never be more creative than that, it will never become the sum of all those parts.<br /><br />And "rules" is what I always seem to come back to. We get so hung up on our "rules". We read it in a book, we were taught it in a class, we saw it on the Internet, a noted photographer told us so. Wherever we pick our "rules" up, we do. I dislike rules, I really do. I tend to think of them more as guides. They give me direction, or inspiration, make suggestions as to what I should do or how. But they ought never tell me what I have to do. Nor should they tell you. There is no single way to use a shutter. Nor an aperture. Nor focus. There is no one appropriate ISO, or white balance. These are all tools, people. Simply that. Use them, not the other way around.<br /><br />For example, if you are out shooting those wildflowers and it is windy and they keep blowing in the wind but things are too dark for a really fast shutter speed, so you crouch there for an hour because you think you have to get those flowers crisp, because details in a landscape photograph have to be crisp, then you are probably on the wrong end of that equation. You are succumbing to one of the so-called "rules". Instead, try embracing the conditions, shoot slow, blur, try it, you might like it. It is ok if you don't though, just don't think you have to use that camera in a particular fashion. There are no "have to's" in photography. Or at least, there shouldn't be.<br /><br />P.S. Every time I post an essay on technicals, I always get a few responses astutely pointing out that photo that breaks the rules for the sake of breaking the rules is not much better than a photo that adheres to the rules at the sake of sacrificing creative vision.<br /><br />Very true. I completely agree.<br /><br />This goes back to that quote I mentioned above about finding a balance between subject and style. Breaking a rule, just to break it, without finding a subject that resonates with that broken rule is no more successful than a photo that is all subject and no style.<br /><br /><br />P.P.S. Apparently, according to my notes at least, this shot was taken one evening at Silver Point along the Oregon coast. Not that the exact location is really all that important with an abstract piece like this. Just thought some of you would probably like to know.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />By: <a href="http://www.zebandrews.com/">Zeb Andrews</a> (USA)<br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><i>Photo: Pentax 6x7 </i></font><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Copyright ©Zeb Andrews , All rights 
reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock. <br />Use without 
written consent by the author (</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Zeb Andrews</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"> ) is illegal and punishable 
by law.<br /><br /></font><br /><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Listening for the Drummer at Shore Acres, 60 seconds</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2010/10/listening-for-the-drummer-at-shore-acres-60-seconds.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2010:/words//12.654</id>

    <published>2010-10-12T07:25:10Z</published>
    <updated>2010-10-12T07:35:24Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ "If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away."&nbsp;- Henry David ThoreauTonight I had a photo, a quote and an idea, lucky for me they all sort of worked together. The photo is relatively recent, my New Year's trip down the Oregon coast with this particular shot being found at Shore Acres State Park and recorded by my Zero Image pinhole on expired film, how expired, I really have no idea. That, by the way,...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<form class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;" contenteditable="false"><img alt="zebstory.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/zeb/zebstory.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="304" width="500" /></form> <div><br /><br /><i>"If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away."</i><br />&nbsp;- Henry David Thoreau<br /><br />Tonight I had a photo, a quote and an idea, lucky for me they all sort of worked together. The photo is relatively recent, my New Year's trip down the Oregon coast with this particular shot being found at Shore Acres State Park and recorded by my Zero Image pinhole on expired film, how expired, I really have no idea. That, by the way, is where the magenta sky comes from. But expired film is the best film for cross processing, the unpredictability of it makes it even more fun. I have been trying to experiment more with self portraiture, especially with pinhole, as the long exposures allow me to trip the shutter and then run around in front of the camera.<br /><br />As far as the quote, I found it just today in a hospital, Legacy Immanuel to be exact. Upon seeing it my mind immediately started churning along and before long I had an idea for a bit of a commentary I wanted to write and was just lacking the photo to accompany it. Actually in truth, it is a train of thought that I have pondered much and deals with the notion of talent.<br /><br />Talent is a bit of a thorn in my side when it comes to photography, mine specifically and just in general. This is mainly because there are quite a few people, maybe even enough for it to be almost a general assumption, that some people are just talented, as in, talented in a way that others not only aren't, but cannot be. I really dislike this idea. I admit, that yes, some photographers are just plain more practised than others, not necessarily better vision, just a bit more experienced at refining it and capturing it in remarkable photographs. But I resist the idea, nay fight it, that talent is some inherent or finite trait that we either possess or do not. I believe talent can be learned, forgotten, bought, sold, borrowed, and in other ways acquired. What I do not believe, is that someone is either a good photographer or not, end of story. I think people who believe that either have forgotten their own humble beginnings, or are too humble themselves.<br /><br />I do not even think talent needs to be considered in the equation. Photography is various parts imagination and technical ability. The imagination to see, the technical ability to operate a camera to make a physical remainder of what only one can see. And we all possess vision, we all are able to imagine, so all that is left is to learn how to operate a camera, which again is something we are all capable of. Sure, some learn quicker than others, some are more "apt". Because of their nature, some budding photographers certainly start with a bit of a headstart, and may progress faster than others, but they are not the sole owners of passion, dedication and determination, and if you possess any or all of those, it does not matter how apt or numb-fingered you are with a camera. Given enough determination, I believe even the biggest technophobe can learn to operate a camera proficiently enough to make wondrous images.<br /><br />As this is beginning to get a bit long-winded, I just want to emphasize that we are all capable. Every person has a great photographer in them. Some of us jump into the quest to find this inner photographer. Some of us stroll along content whether we find them or not. Some shun their inner photographer to become instead great writers or musicians or whatever their hearts tugs them towards. I do feel a bit strongly on this topic, but mainly because I deal with it every day. And it can actually pain me to see those I consider to already be great photographers in effect put themselves down because they believe others are more talented or that they do not possess this necessary talent and can never acquire it. Quite simply, the notion of talent is hogwash. Just go take pictures and stop worrying about<br /><br />Photography and words by <a href="http://www.zebandrews.com/">Zeb Andrews</a> (USA) <br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><i>Photo: Pinhole, Zero Image, Zero 6x9, cross processed</i></font><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Copyright ©Zeb Andrews , All rights 
reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock. <br />Use without 
written consent by the author (</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Zeb Andrews</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"> ) is illegal and punishable 
by law.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></font><br /><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>No such thing as bad weather</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2010/07/no-such-thing-as-bad-weather-by-zeb-andrews.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2010:/words//12.608</id>

    <published>2010-07-19T07:53:24Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-19T07:59:41Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ Approaching storm clouds in southeastern Oregon.I know more than a few photographers who refuse to leave the house unless an epic sunset or sunrise is promised.&nbsp; At the same time there is a running joke amongst some of my photographer friends about how I have unbelievable luck with "good" weather.&nbsp; This has been tested over the last three weeks on my weekly outings to the various bridges.&nbsp; Every time I invite others out with me, they tend to glance apprehensively at the looming rain clouds while joking that my streak with good weather may just be coming to an...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Oregon-days.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/zeb/Oregon-days.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="389" width="500" /></span> <div><br /><b>Approaching storm clouds in southeastern Oregon.</b><br /><br /><br />I know more than a few photographers who refuse to leave the house unless an epic sunset or sunrise is promised.&nbsp; At the same time there is a running joke amongst some of my photographer friends about how I have unbelievable luck with "good" weather.&nbsp; This has been tested over the last three weeks on my weekly outings to the various bridges.&nbsp; Every time I invite others out with me, they tend to glance apprehensively at the looming rain clouds while joking that my streak with good weather may just be coming to an end.&nbsp; Then of course we show up and the clouds break and the sun beams through and there are rainbows and unicorns and elves and we get amazing photographs.<br /><br />Or something like that.<br /><br />This coming from the guy who over the past two winters has taught a "Winter landscape" class through Newspace expressly geared toward getting the rainiest, worst weather possible.&nbsp; The first year I did that, my good luck almost was my undoing and the class was graced with a rare gorge snow, making things unarguably beautiful.<br /><br />I did much better this past winter at Cape Kiwanda getting some of the wettest and most blustery conditions I have ever experienced out there while trying to take pictures.&nbsp; We got shellacked by the weather.<br /><br />And you know what?&nbsp; Out of all the classes I have taught, that one probably produced the best pictures.<br /><br />I like tell people several things when it comes to weather.&nbsp; The first is that good and bad really have no relation to the weather.&nbsp; Weather is like light, it is just is.&nbsp; There is no good or bad weather, it is all in your approach to it, how much you are chained down by your own perceptions and expectations.&nbsp; As photographers we like to blame light and weather for a lot of our own shortcomings.&nbsp; "ah, the light was horrible" or "the weather sucked".&nbsp; But you know what, if you didn't get any shots it is your own fault, not that of the weather.<br /><br />Second, and following the first then, when my friends now joke with me about my good luck with good weather I tend to joke back that for me all weather is good, be it rain, ice, sun, etc.&nbsp; I am sort of like how the post office used to be.&nbsp; Yes, neither sleet nor dark of night slow me down as well.<br /><br />Third, I prefer the so-called "bad" weather because all the places I like to go such as downtown, the Gorge, or the beach are all much less crowded on those days.<br /><br />Fourth, as a photographer who photographs in "bad" weather you tend to get all the pictures the fair weather photographers miss.&nbsp; In a time where some of us hoard locations like precious minerals, it is amazing the change in the quality of your images you can bring about simply by going out in crummy weather to the usual spots.<br /><br />Fifth, you never know.&nbsp; You just don't.&nbsp; "Bad" weather tends to be more dynamic and more prone to rapid change.&nbsp; It can pour one moment but the next those storm clouds may ease aside for a brilliant sunset.&nbsp; This is less likely to happen on sunny days it seems.&nbsp; I tend to go out with as few expectations as possible and see what I can find.<br /><br />Sixth, I just love rain and wind.&nbsp; They make me feel alive.&nbsp; I was out in the Gorge this weekend in the rain.&nbsp; My coat still smelled like wet moss today.&nbsp; It was great.<br /><br />Anyway, so if you know a fair-weather photographer, the next time the skies gray up, kick them in the rump and drag them out with you.&nbsp; You'll be amazed at how differently beautiful the world is in the rain, or sleet, or dark of night... <br /><br /><br />By: Photography and words by: <a href="http://zebandrewsphotography.com/">Zeb Andrews</a> (USA) ©2010<br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><i>Shot with a Pentax 6x7</i></font><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><b><br /><br /><span class="caps">COPYRIGHT NOTICE</span></b><br />Copyright






















 ©Zeb Andrews. All rights reserved. This photo is not to be 
used
 
as
 free 
stock. <br />Use without written consent by the author (</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Zeb Andrews</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">)
 
is&nbsp; 
illegal and punishable by law.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></font><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A box, a hole and my imagination. </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2010/06/on-pinhole.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2010:/words//12.599</id>

    <published>2010-06-03T07:25:58Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-03T08:18:01Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;It is slow, it is simple and it is durable.Those of you who know me, know that I enjoy my pinhole camera.&nbsp; I rarely go out on any photographic excursion without it in fact.&nbsp; So, I figured I would spend a few minutes tonight introducing it to those of you who are not familiar with it.The camera I use is made by Zero Image in Hong Kong.&nbsp; They make beautiful, wooden cameras that operate as wonderfully as they are beautiful.&nbsp; My specific camera is the Zero 6×9 multi-format, though I only ever shoot it in 6×9. There are three main...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<b><font style="font-size: 0.64em;">&nbsp;</font><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">It is slow, it is simple and it is durable</font></b>.<br /><br /><br />Those of you who know me, know that I enjoy my pinhole camera.&nbsp; I rarely go out on any photographic excursion without it in fact.&nbsp; So, I figured I would spend a few minutes tonight introducing it to those of you who are not familiar with it.<br /><br />The camera I use is made by Zero Image in Hong Kong.&nbsp; They make beautiful, wooden cameras that operate as wonderfully as they are beautiful.&nbsp; My specific camera is the Zero 6×9 multi-format, though I only ever shoot it in 6×9.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="zebph1.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/zeb/zebph1.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="304" width="501" /></span><br /> <div><br /><br />There are three main reasons I enjoy my pinhole so much: it is slow, it is simple and it is durable.&nbsp; I am often amused at the irony that my love of nature and my love of photography have combined to get me out to more places than I would have otherwise, but that pressing desire to photograph those places sometimes causes me to rush and scramble so much for the next shot as to actually distract me from enjoying the scenery right in front of me.&nbsp; The aperture on my pinhole is a "blazing" f250.&nbsp; That means even on fairly bright days I am going to have exposures ranging from 15 to 60 seconds in length.&nbsp; It is not uncommon for me to expect to wait out a five or eight minute exposure either.&nbsp; What I have found this does is that it slows me down.&nbsp; I tend to find myself relaxing a bit more, looking around, studying and planning, but also just simply enjoying.&nbsp; The required wait on the camera pays off in a more relaxed approach to the landscape around me.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="zebph2.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/zeb/zebph2.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" height="300" width="200" /></span><br />I also enjoy my pinhole camera for it's sheer simplicity.&nbsp; It is a wooden box with a hole on one side.&nbsp; No meter, no viewfinder, no shutter speeds per se, or LCD display.&nbsp; A box, a hole and my imagination.&nbsp; It is amazing how liberating that can be.&nbsp; As such, I find myself asking more questions with my pinhole camera, such as this shot.&nbsp; I wondered how this composition would work with the sun blazing in the frame and the people splashing in the fountain over the long exposure.&nbsp; So I set the camera up and proceeded to answer that question.&nbsp; Instead of worrying about the camera, and the necessary manipulations required to operate it, I was concentrating on using that camera.&nbsp; A subtle, yet important shift in perspective.<br /><br />The simplicity of the images is also appealing to me.&nbsp; Sure, they are a bit soft, it is after all merely a hole in brass foil, no high quality optical glass or state of the art coatings here.&nbsp; But again I find that to be a benefit far more often than a hindrance.&nbsp; Too often I see photographers hung up on the belief that if they pursue technical precision as far as they can, then they are bound to produce good photographs in the process.&nbsp; There is some validity to this, a photograph has to be technically precise enough to convey its message, but the danger is believing that technical precision or perfection is in itself a strong enough message.&nbsp; It rarely is in my experience.&nbsp; Especially since there are many photographers out there skilled enough to produce images that are both technically precise and evocative.&nbsp; Pinhole shakes that up just a bit.&nbsp; It is not as sharp as lensed cameras.&nbsp; Its details are a bit soft and impressionistic.&nbsp; But I have found that when used appropriately, most people do not even notice.&nbsp; And this underscores what I said above, that technical precision is important to a degree, but knowing how to effectively use your camera and its abilities is far more important.&nbsp; And being so simple in nature, I feel the pinhole is a relatively easy camera to get to know in this fashion.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="zebph3.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/zeb/zebph3.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" height="300" width="201" /></span><br /></div><div><br /><br />Finally, I can rarely have a discussion about pinhole without mentioning how durable this camera is.&nbsp; My camera has been dropped into the ocean...twice.&nbsp; It fell off my tripod and got swept over the Eagle Falls at Lake Tahoe.&nbsp; It jumped off my lap and out of a parked car in NW Portland once, shattering itself on the sidewalk.&nbsp; It was probably tired of being dropped in the ocean.&nbsp; But for all those adventures, it still works.&nbsp; The images it makes look as good as the day I bought it.&nbsp; The second time it fell in the ocean, it took about three minutes for me to find it in the surf.&nbsp; When I did, it was buried under wet sand, with only the leg of my tripod to indicate where it was.&nbsp; I opened the camera, dumped out the salt water and sand, then ran it under the faucet in a nearby restroom to rinse it out.&nbsp; I dried it with paper towels and had it reloaded within 15 minutes.&nbsp; I cannot say this would have been possible with any of my other cameras.&nbsp; As long as I can keep the box light tight, and as long as I do not damage the pinhole itself, this camera will last a lifetime or more.<br />Of course, it does not look nowhere near as nice as it used to.&nbsp; But it has plenty of character, and stories.<br /><br /><br />Photography and words by: <a href="http://zebandrewsphotography.com/">Zeb Andrews</a><i> (USA)</i> ©2010<br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1em;">Pinhole, <a href="http://www.zeroimage.com/">Zero Image</a></font><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><b><br /><br /><br /><br /><span class="caps">COPYRIGHT NOTICE</span></b><br />Copyright





















 ©Zeb Andrews. All rights reserved. This photo is not to be 
used
 
as
 free 
stock. <br />Use without written consent by the author (</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Zeb Andrews</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">)
 
is&nbsp; 
illegal and punishable by law.</font><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Secret Locations&quot; by Zeb Andrews</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2010/04/secret-locations-by-zeb-abdrews.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2010:/words//12.573</id>

    <published>2010-04-20T06:05:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-20T06:40:02Z</updated>

    <summary> Those who think they are the only ones looking, tend to be looking at far less than the rest.Ok, before I get into this, let me preface by saying it has been a long week. I am fairly worn out and as such perhaps a bit more grumpy and rant-prone than usual. But nonetheless, what I am about to rant about is behavior that has bugged me for a little while now, I generally just don&apos;t pay much attention to it. At the same time, it is behavior I don&apos;t understand, at least fully, so I am willing to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="zeba.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/zeba.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="328" /></span> <div><br /><font style="font-size: 1em;"><font style="font-size: 1.95312em;">Those who think they are the only ones looking, tend to be looking at far less than the rest.</font><br /><br /><br /></font>Ok, before I get into this, let me preface by saying it has been a long 
week.  I am fairly worn out and as such perhaps a bit more grumpy and 
rant-prone than usual.  But nonetheless, what I am about to rant 
about is behavior that has bugged me for a little while now, I generally
 just don't pay much attention to it.  At the same time, it is behavior I
 don't understand, at least fully, so I am willing to hear counter 
arguments to my following rant.  If you disagree, please speak up, argue
 your point, let us have a discussion.  A side rant of mine is I tend to
 enjoy too little discussion on here, but that is beside the point.<br />
<br />
One rant at a time.<br /><br />So here goes.  What gives with photographers who believe they need to 
keep places all "secret"?  I see this most often with landscape 
photographers.  They will go off to a place, generally one that is 
hardly undiscovered, and come back from it with their photos which they 
will gladly share, and often boast of, but will make sure to mention 
that it is their "secret" location.  Now, I am not talking about the 
habit of not including location data, I mean, I don't always post where a
 photo is.  Generally this is because it is not anywhere specific or I 
don't know how to describe where it is.  Such as with some of my photos 
of the Palouse.  Sure I could get down the map and scour it for 30 
minutes finding the exact coordinates of where I took that photo.  But I
 don't.  If someone asks, I will try to give them as good of directions 
as possible.<br />
<br />
So I understand the lack of location data.  Rather, what makes me 
scratch my head a bit is photographers who go out of their way to brag 
about how a location is secret and they are not telling.  <br />
<br />
I mean, why?  Really?<br />
<br />
In a sense it always makes me wonder if the photographer is a little 
insecure about their own abilities, isn't this generally why one boasts?
  Because they feel some need to impress others by letting everyone know
 how special they are?  Ok, maybe I am being a bit harsh.  Maybe.  Told 
you I was feeling rant-prone.<br />
<br />
Insecure or not, I think it is kind of bad form and etiquette.  If you 
don't want to share where a place is, I guess that is your decision, but
 bragging about your secret spot is a bit over the top.<br />
<br />
And then there are those photographers who make full use of places like 
Flickr or Photo.net to locate spots that others have shot, asking 
questions on where locations are and such, and then refuse to share that
 information themselves.  Kind of self-serving and selfish.  I had a 
customer in the store once who was talking about how foolish most Flickr
 photographers were to share so much information, that he did not post 
because he did not want people to know where his favorite spots were, 
but he did like to get on there now and then to see where everyone else 
was going and thought it a good use for that.  He was a bit of an 
arrogant scumbag too.  But perhaps that is beside the point.<br />
<br />
So the question I keep coming back to is, why?  What is the reasoning 
behind this behavior?  Are they afraid others will get down there and 
steal their photos?  Can you really steal a photo?  If so then perhaps 
the problem doesn't lie with the availability of info on where that 
location is, but rather with your own ability to be creative.  And I 
think that gets to one of the hearts of the matter.  With so many 
landscape photographers out there, many areas get saturated in terms of 
how often they get photographed, and so the competitive nature (another 
silly piece of behavior) drives photographers to not only range farther 
afield to "new" areas but to try and hide that info from other 
photographers so they cannot get out there and make their own pictures.<br />
<br />
I have two responses to that.  First, I have a whole series of the St. 
Johns Bridge created over several years.  I find that I take my best and
 most creative photos in the places I am most familiar with, that I have
 visited the most.  Sure I get nice photos in new places too, but those 
pictures tend to be based on experience I have gained experimenting in 
those places familiar with me.<br />
<br />
And second, I learn a lot more from seeing others photograph in a place I
 have been to, than I could hope to on my own.  What I mean is, by 
seeing how others photograph the Palouse, or Painted Hills or the Alvord
 Desert I learn about other comps, conditions, techniques.  Way more 
than I ever probably would have on my own.  So in the long run it is a 
benefit to myself to share that info and encourage others to those spots
 to photograph their own perceptions.  At least that is how I think 
about it.<br />
<br />
Now to be fair I have heard a good argument or two for keeping locations
 secret, but these tend to be the incredibly small minority.  One was a 
photographer who was taking pictures of a Mennonite community in New 
England.  He did not want to share the location of this rural community 
because he did not want photographers bum-rushing out there to take 
photographic advantage of this quiet community of people.  I can 
appreciate him trying to protect them while still trying share their 
experience with the world.  The second good excuse involved the Boiler 
Bay headlands along the Oregon coast because the popular trail to the 
coast involved crossing private property, specifically someone's front 
yard.  Most photographers will behave themselves, nonetheless I probably
 would not appreciate a flood of photographers sneaking across my front 
lawn all the time in the pre-dawn darkness.  Now an alternate route has 
been laid out that avoids the property and respects these people's 
privacy much better.<br />
<br />
But that is about it, at least that I can think of.<br />
<br />
I dunno, I struggle with this one, because on one hand I really don't 
care much.  To each their own, or such.  But on the other hand, it also 
strikes me as bad etiquette which can lead to bad habits and the 
teaching of.  But even more so than that, because I think allowing 
yourself to fall into that trap of location hoarding is not a healthy 
perspective for a good photographer.  I think it is a symptom of some 
underlying problem.  I am not a psychiatrist though.  Imagine that 
though, photographic psychiatry!  <br />
<br />
Anyway, as I was saying, if you think the success of your photos relies 
on you hiding where you take them, then you probably are not a terribly 
good photographer.  Perhaps competent, maybe even good, but probably not
 great.  Because a great photographer isn't limited by his location, 
secret or not, he carries all the secrets of his or her success with 
them.  They are called vision and imagination.  Between those two 
things, they make secret locations irrelevant.  In my opinion.<br />
<br />
So my advice to all you location hoarders?  Don't.  It's ok.  Share 
information, encourage those around you to go there and shoot.  Help 
them get better because by doing so, they will help you get better too. 
 It is not a contest, nor should you feel like you can be collecting 
these spots.  And if you do insist on keeping your secret locations, 
don't show us photos of them.  Keep them secret.  It is mildly obnoxious
 to dangle them in front of us and not be willing to share where they 
are.  Chances are, somebody else already knows anyway.  You probably 
were not the first one there.  In fact, that is almost certainly the 
case.  And if you still insist on going this far, then at least have the
 decency to stop taking advantage of other photographers who are willing
 to share their information.  Because that is just selfish and I am out 
of excuses for you at this point.<br />
<br />
Ok, wow, that really was quite a rant.  Have not done that in a while.<br />
<br />
So to sum all this up, let me just say this one last thing, sort of as 
the icing on the cake.  That is, I have a lot of serious thoughts on 
photography, but I try not to take any of them too seriously.  Even this
 rant.  Sure, it was worth the twenty minutes of typing to put it out 
there, but at the same time, it really is not that important because I 
am going to keep doing what I do, in a way that I feel good about doing 
it.  And all the location-hoarders in the world cannot affect that.<br /><br /><br />Photography and words by <a href="http://www.zebandrews.com/">Zeb Andrews</a> <i>(USA)</i> <font style="font-size: 0.8em;">©2010</font><br /><font style="font-size: 1em;"><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Photography: Pinhole, Zero Image<br /></font>This shot by the way was sunrise at a super ultra secret location called
 Hug Point along the Oregon Coast just south of Cannon Beach.  Don't 
bother to ask me where it is, I'm not telling.  <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Copyright ©Zeb Andrews , All rights 
reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock. <br />Use without 
written consent by the author (</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Zeb Andrews</font><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"> ) is illegal and punishable 
by law.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></font><br /><br /><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Jared&apos;s Departure</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2009/01/jareds-departure.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2009:/words//12.318</id>

    <published>2009-01-27T08:40:38Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-01T09:47:41Z</updated>

    <summary> The garage in this picture housed a homeless drug addict when we moved into the adjacent house on Oswego Avenue. The guy&apos;s dwelling consisted of an old door propped on cinder blocks which he used as his bed and an old TV powered by an extension cord that ran from our basement window across the lawn into the garage. The TV served as his only light source. His squat was nestled between a heap of junk which consisted of broken appliances, paint cans, miscellaneous garden tools and the boarded up car port door. He draped tar paper over the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Jareds Departure.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/wayne/Jareds%20Departure.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="500" /></span> <div><br />The garage in this picture housed a homeless drug addict when we moved into the adjacent house on Oswego Avenue. The guy's dwelling consisted of an old door propped on cinder blocks which he used as his bed and an old TV powered by an extension cord that ran from our basement window across the lawn into the garage. The TV served as his only light source. His squat was nestled between a heap of junk which consisted of broken appliances, paint cans, miscellaneous garden tools and the boarded up car port door. He draped tar paper over the whole thing presumably offering some insulation in the dank chemical fumed storage space.<br /><br />Weeks after the homeless man had purportedly vacated his tar paper shanty, our neighbors complained of a mysterious beeping coming inside the garage. At the time, we didn't have keys but rather relied on a rusty hand saw to jimmy the lock. We tried to slide the saw between the jam and the frame as we usually do, but it wouldn't budge the lock. I decided to crawl through the window to investigate the noise. I found myself alone in the dark with the beeping. The window let in just enough light for me to make out the vaguely reflective tar paper propped over the homeless man's former home. I couldn't see what was beeping. I couldn't see the locked door. Panic struck.<br /><br />My first encounter with the homeless man was on our initial tour of the property. Our landlady ducked into a room showing us the lower level bedroom and there he was sleeping at three in the afternoon with his bed roll and TV. We learned that the landlord was paying him and letting him stay in the house and in exchange he helped her to fix the place up. When we moved in, we insisted that she change the locks.<br /><br />I saw him a few times after that. He stopped by to stain the deck and take care of some loose ends and then he was gone. A week later, I found the extension cord running from our basement, under the deck, across the lawn and into the locked garage. We expressed concern to our landlady and she said he was living there. We were kind, said we didn't mind but were concerned for his health. She aired the place out and we agreed to give him a week to move on. And he did. Then he came back for his TV and bike, stayed a week, then he left again. Then the beeping started in the garage and I found myself in the dark, with the beeping, not knowing if I was alone.<br /><br />bee-beep, bee-beep, bee-beep. My heart beating thum-thump, thum-thump.<br /><br />A nascent fear of the dark crept up on me. Like as kid, when I'd shut the bathroom door without hitting the light switch. Light could not come soon enough. I feared the unknown. I plunged through the unknown, hitting my knee on a bucket and fumbling to unlock the deadbolt. Suddenly the daylight swept in and my friends stood there completely unaware of my ordeal.<br /><br />"What's beeping?"<br /><br />With the light from the door, we were able to trace the noise to a smoke detector submerged in a bucket of water.<br /><br />On the day Jared left for Colorado, we all threw knives at the fence he and I built last winter, Denise gave him a flower and I took this picture. Then he drove off in his Yugo. Molly drove the bus. The warm comfy bus with hard wood floors and a wood stove. When he was about a mile away, I called him to tell him that he had forgotten to take his dog with him. He came back and got him. Then we said goodbye again. <br /><br />Photography and words by: <a href="http://www.oliverogden.com/">Oliver Ogden</a> <i>(USA)</i><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><br /><b>COPYRIGHT NOTICE</b>&nbsp; ©2009<br />Copyright ©Oliver Ogden , All rights reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock. <br />Use without written consent by the author (Oliver Ogden ) is illegal and punishable by law.<br /></font><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Salmon River Chronicles</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2008/11/the-salmon-river-chronicles.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2008:/words//12.227</id>

    <published>2008-11-03T11:15:58Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-03T11:24:44Z</updated>

    <summary>Part Idaybreakat a boat rampfifteen miles up the salmon riverfrom riggins, idahobeneath a gnarly juniper treesit the three buddhaspassing a jointthey hear a &apos;57 chevrolet bel-air nomadroaring up the river road towards themthe chevyis pulling a 23 foot jet boat on a trailerand it turns off into the gravel parking lotcirclesand comes to a stopthe buddhas watchas the chevy backs across the lot,at 40 miles per hour,straight down the rampsuddenly breakingand sliding the last 20 yardsthe trailer comes to an abrupt stopall the wheels buried below waterand the jet sled pops offgod rolls down the window&quot;turboglide, baby,&quot; he says,&quot;you gotta...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<br /><b>Part I</b><br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Part I.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/wayne/Part%20I.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="233" width="500" /></span><br /><br /><br /><div>daybreak<br />at a boat ramp<br />fifteen miles up the salmon river<br />from riggins, idaho<br />beneath a gnarly juniper tree<br />sit the three buddhas<br />passing a joint<br />they hear a '57 chevrolet bel-air nomad<br />roaring up the river road towards them<br />the chevy<br />is pulling a 23 foot jet boat on a trailer<br />and it turns off into the gravel parking lot<br />circles<br />and comes to a stop<br />the buddhas watch<br />as the chevy backs across the lot,<br />at 40 miles per hour,<br />straight down the ramp<br />suddenly breaking<br />and sliding the last 20 yards<br />the trailer comes to an abrupt stop<br />all the wheels buried below water<br />and the jet sled pops off<br />god rolls down the window<br />"turboglide, baby," he says,<br />"you gotta love it"<br />"where've you been?" asks one of the buddhas<br />"yeah, it seems like an eternity,"<br />says another buddha<br />as he takes a toke off the joint<br />"well let me enlighten you," says god<br />"it's a big universe"<br />"an empty universe," says the second buddha<br />"and it's expanding," adds the third<br />as he holds the smoke in his lungs<br />"you boys want to fish or talk?" asks god<br />the buddhas look at each other;<br />"fish," they say in unison<br />"well, you might want to grab the boat<br />before it leaves without us," says god<br />"and would one of you mind getting me<br />another budweiser<br />out of the cooler on the back?"<br />the buddhas grab the rope<br />and a bud for god<br />"thanks," says god<br />as He snaps back the lid<br />of a zippo lighter<br />and fires up a lucky strike<br />blue smoke curls to the heavens<br />the air is soft, expectant<br />sage, juniper, spent lighter fluid<br />across from the ramp<br />in a pocket of water<br />of dark, blue green water,<br />a steelhead rolls<br />"i'll go park the rig," says god,<br />as he looks up the canyon,<br />with a smile.<br /><br /><br /><b>Part II</b><br /><br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Part II.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/wayne/Part%20II.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="233" width="500" /></span><br /></div><div><br /><br />face of the deep waters, baby<br />without form,<br />fathomless<br />void<br />god, moving<br />mystic mists<br />twilight<br />the witching hour<br />and god said, "let there be steelhead"<br />and there were steelhead<br />but no one could catch them<br />and He saw that the steelhead were good<br />and god said, "the rest will take care of itself"<br />"what are you saying?" ask the buddhas<br />from within the cabin of the jet boat<br />fogged by sweet smoke<br />"nothing," says god, "i was just talking to myself"<br />"nothing?" repeats the first buddha<br />all three buddhas start snickering<br />"steelhead have buddha nature," say the buddhas<br />"well, they live in the present moment,<br />and are mindful only of themselves,<br />i will say that," says god<br />as they approach a class five rapid,<br />god momentarily slows the jet boat<br />as He reads the waters<br />big water<br />big fucking water<br />big water forced through<br />narrow canyon walls<br />then god surges into the white water<br />and at full throttle<br />cuts all the way across<br />between two rocks,<br />gigantic, ancient, submerged<br />and then up again and through<br />suddenly<br />still up on plane<br />they are gliding<br />on a long slick of smooth water<br />autumn colors succumb to purple<br />mourning purple<br />shadows birthed by steep canyon walls<br />"when are we going to fish?"<br />asks the first buddha<br />"yeah, is this a good spot?<br />asks the second<br />"is this where the steelhead dwell?"<br />ask the third buddha.<br />up at the helm, god squints around<br />and takes a long drag<br />on a slightly damp lucky strike<br />"how should i know," says god<br />"omniscience has its limitations."<br /><br /><br /><b>off the bow<br />of a jet sled<br />on the salmon river<br />in southern idaho</b><br /><br /><br />By: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/77053677@N00/">Wayne Mackeson</a> <i>(USA)</i> ©2008<br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><i>Photo's: zero image 69, pinhole camera, kodak e100vs color slide film<br />image cropped to 15x7 </i></font><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><br /><b>COPYRIGHT NOTICE</b> <br />Copyright ©Wayne Mackeson, All rights reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock. <br />Use without written consent by the author (Wayne Mackeson) is illegal and punishable by law.</font><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><b>NOTE</b><br />Thiaps will take the full&nbsp; responsibility for publishing this work.<br />If you feel offended please let us know.</font><br />&nbsp;<br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why Lo-Fi in the Digital Age?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2008/10/why-lo-fi-in-the-digital-age.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2008:/words//12.172</id>

    <published>2008-10-01T08:00:42Z</published>
    <updated>2008-10-01T09:01:09Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Why Lo-Fi in the Digital Age?This is a question I've been asking myself for a whilenow. I own a number of film (35mm &amp; Medium format) anddigital cameras, but time and time again I reach for one ofmy holgas, as my camera of choice. However I still can'tfind an answer.For me it starts with loading the camera. The choice isvast - film brand, colour, black and white, slide,negative, 100iso, 400iso, 120N, 120GFN. At the moment I'mexperimenting with various combinations to see the differentresults, nothing is predictable when it comes to lo-fi.Holgas all have different qualities as well, some aresharper than...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="tim500.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/images/tim500.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="500" /></span><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>Why Lo-Fi in the Digital Age?</b></font><br /><br />This is a question I've been asking myself for a while<br />now. I own a number of film (35mm &amp; Medium format) and<br />digital cameras, but time and time again I reach for one of<br />my holgas, as my camera of choice. However I still can't<br />find an answer.<br /><br />For me it starts with loading the camera. The choice is<br />vast - film brand, colour, black and white, slide,<br />negative, 100iso, 400iso, 120N, 120GFN. At the moment I'm<br />experimenting with various combinations to see the different<br />results, nothing is predictable when it comes to lo-fi.<br />Holgas all have different qualities as well, some are<br />sharper than others, some leak and like the one I used in<br />Italy this summer, some melt! It's because of this that I<br />keep adding new cameras to the collection.<br /><br />Not only do I try different kind of films in them, I also<br />vary the light conditions that I shoot in, recently I've<br />been using bulb a lot (Hand held and on the tripod) and<br />varying the exposure time.&nbsp; The approach for me when using<br />the bulb is still rather lo-fi, I guess. I've found using<br />the bulb can get some great movement in the picture.<br /><br />Much has been written about the £20 plastic camera over<br />the years, how it produces dreamy soft focused pictures to<br />how it makes a picture that was taken yesterday a vintage<br />feel. However maybe the answer to my question is, a<br />combination of all these factors.<br /><br />During writing this piece I've ask the same question to<br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="caption1.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/images/caption1.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="83" width="200" /></span>various photographers, their answer seem to be more concise than mine, "lo-fi is the new digital" "It takes me<br />back to the way my father used a camera" " <br />Its art" "In a world of over saturated HDR pictures its my calm moments, its reality." <br /><br />The sales of holgas are on the increase judging by some of<br />the threads on flickr, so if you've not ventured into the<br />world of lo-fi give it ago.<br /><br />This has been a personal view of my love of holgas, in my<br />next piece I'll look at the different lo-fi - toy cameras<br />that people are shooting with. In the mean time if you are a<br />Diana (original or +) convert I would like to <a href="mailto:themitchard@tiscali.co.uk">hear</a> from you.<br /><br /><b>Tim Mitchard</b>&nbsp; <i>(THIAPS Editor Lo-Fi)<br /><br /><br /><br /></i>photo: By <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/doctorboogie/">Tim Mitchard</a><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><i>Holga 120N 1 second on Bulb. HP5&nbsp; <br /><br /><br /><br /></i></font> <div><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The storm by Zeb Andrews</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2008/09/the-storm-by-zeb-andrews.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2008:/words//12.130</id>

    <published>2008-09-15T09:04:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-15T09:55:52Z</updated>

    <summary> The stormThanks to everyone who took the time to stop and look at the previous photo I posted. Tonight I had meant to post this shot and discuss my thoughts behind it at a bit of a greater length, but we shall see how far I get. I have been at the computer all day scanning and editing an image for a job, so my neck is sore and my eyes are tired, and it is a thoroughly less pleasant fatigue than the one you enjoy physically after a good hike in the woods. Anyway, my attempt with my...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="The storm.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/images/The%20storm.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="414" width="500" /></span> <div><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>The storm</b></font><br /><br /><br />Thanks to everyone who took the time to stop and look at the previous
photo I posted. Tonight I had meant to post this shot and discuss my
thoughts behind it at a bit of a greater length, but we shall see how
far I get. I have been at the computer all day scanning and editing an
image for a job, so my neck is sore and my eyes are tired, and it is a
thoroughly less pleasant fatigue than the one you enjoy physically
after a good hike in the woods.<br />
<br />
Anyway, my attempt with my last photo was just to change the pace a
little. I know part of my opinion coming up is cynicism, but also not
entirely. I just wanted to take a shot at the 5-second attention span
many of us use to rule our lives. Regarding photography specifically
you notice this by watching a person's viewing habits. What do we do
when browsing Flickr, but flip flip flip.<br />
<br />
And flip flip flip.  <br />
<br />
I am certainly not immune to this, and have been paying a lot more
attention to it lately and trying to slow myself down. It is one of the
reasons I have been leaving fewer comments is I have been looking at
fewer photos and trying to leave more personal comments than the usual
"Excellent photo!" or "stonking good shot!". Yes that last is a nod to
our good friend RC, for those of you who know who I am talking about.
;-) He is sort of the antithesis of what I was trying to encourage with
my last photo.<br />
<br />
Whoa, speaking of short attention spans, cannot let myself get too
distracted. Anyway, I just notice this behavior in people (again myself
included) and it sort of bugs me. Well ok, it bugs me a great deal. I
recently rented a car for my trip up to Mt. Rainier. It had Sirius
radio. Something like 156 stations to listen to. You know what I spent
most of my time doing? Flipping stations!!!<br />
<br />
And flip flip flip. Eventually I just turned the radio off and read a
book (not while driving though). It was ridiculous. I find I do the
same in hotel rooms when presented with cable television. It is almost
too hard to resist. Oooh so many channels, cannot decide. I'll watch
Discovery for 30 seconds until a commercial, then flip over to History.
Wonder what is on AMC or HBO?<br />
<br />
What I find a bit unsettling though, is sometimes I wonder if this
attitude is affecting how we perceive the world, and hence the photos
we take. They tend to rely more on intense colors, dynamic
compositions, shock and awe. They have to, the average person only
looks at a photo for a handful of seconds, it has to have a hook. <br />
<br />
Nothing really wrong with that, unless you sacrifice depth to achieve
it. I was browsing a really cool book of Ansel Adams' photos today over
lunch (no I really do never stop thinking about photography). His
photos certainly are full of drama and contrast, but they also have
depth to them. They appeal to the wandering eye as well as the
lingering one.<br />
<br />
This is where I worry about the trends of our perceptions. We
continuously think that a photo has to be vibrant, punchy, and
saturated. Our black and white photos have to be contrasty and
impending. And notice how these words work into our vocabulary. How
often do we talk about the soft palette of colors an image celebrates?
Or the extensive tonal range? What about richness without contrast?
Sure, these still come up, but less frequently than they used to. <br />
<br />
A couple of comments I received sparked various thoughts in my head. On
the last self-portrait I posted taken at Lost Lake with my pinhole
(that 4 minute exposure) someone commented on the extraordinary
patience I must have. Really? Is it that extraordinary these days to be
able to stand still and occupy one's self for 4 minutes? And I will
even be more honest, I was not even occupying myself. I had a gorgeous
lake and mountain in front of me to do it. Is it really such a gulf
between 4 seconds and 4 minutes that people think I must be superhuman
to bridge it?<br />
<br />
And the second comment someone left on my last photo about the machine
gun nature of DSLRs contributing to this drive-by attention span we
have going. I think there is definitely some validity to this. The
ability to fire through 1000 shots without having to stop to reload or
waste film certainly plays a role. But I think this is more a matter of
the egg coming before the chicken. We use digital cameras in this
fashion because we want to. No sense blaming our behavior on the
camera. It is not like that D70 is whispering seductively in your ear
"come on, just 50 more frames, no need to stop to think or enjoy any of
this. Just shoot shoot shoot." As I have said before, the important
stuff all happens behind the camera. If a DSLR becomes a photo-machine
gun it is because the photographer makes it one. And that photographer
is just as likely to do so with a film camera too. Trust me, I know
some of these people personally.<br />
<br />
Anyway, these are all late night musings. Things I have noticed. I am
not saying I am right. I am not saying I have a solution if I am. I am
not even saying if you do this, you shouldn't. The great thing about
photography is we each get to approach it how we will, and we should. <br />
<br />
I have just been noticing this behavior a bit in myself and am
attempting to curb it, because I feel like I get better photos when I
do. If we approach the world only looking for the flashy stuff, we will
find it. And we will take photos of it. But if you make an effort to
move a bit slowly, to find the scenes that suck you in and hold you
enthralled for minutes on end, you stand a good chance of taking photos
that do the same. Isn't that what a photographer should aim for, that
is, a photo that draws the viewer in and holds them enthralled. Is it
really that fulfilling to take a photo that impresses someone for 4-10
seconds before they move on to the next image? I would rather take one
picture that stopped someone for 5 minutes, than 30 images that stopped
them for 10 seconds each. <br />
<br />
Anyway, looks like I got a fair distance down after all. But enough is
enough. You know the drill, got enough time for a single minute again?
;-)<br />
<br />
And Brian it is ok to want to taste this, makes me want to too, so there are at least two of us weirdos out there. <br /><br /><br />By: <a href="http://www.bluemooncamera.com/">Zeb Andrews</a> <i>(USA)</i> ©2008<br /><br /><i><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Photo:Pentax 6x7</font></i><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><b>COPYRIGHT NOTICE</b><br />Copyright © Zeb Andrews. All rights reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock.<br />Use without written consent by the author (Zeb Andrews) is illegal and punishable by law.</font><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Show and tell by Zeb Andrews</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2008/09/zeb-andrews.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2008:/words//12.111</id>

    <published>2008-09-09T06:49:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-15T09:13:27Z</updated>

    <summary> Show and tellThis is a macro shot I recently discovered amongst some of my older negatives. Unlike the bulk of my macro photos, this one was taken with my 35mm Nikon SLR as opposed to my giant behemoth of a Pentax. I just wrapped up a weekend of speaking at the Oregon State Fair, which I thought was both successful and quite enjoyable. Successful in that there seemed to be at least one person in every one of my lectures who seemed to take something from them. I like reaching out and being able to touch people like that....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Zeb Andrews.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/images/Zeb%20Andrews.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="330" /></span> <div><br /><div align="center"><div align="left"><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><b>Show and tell</b></font><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><br /></font></div><div align="left"><br />This is a macro shot I recently discovered amongst some of my older
negatives. Unlike the bulk of my macro photos, this one was taken with
my 35mm Nikon SLR as opposed to my giant behemoth of a Pentax.<br />
<br />
I just wrapped up a weekend of speaking at the Oregon State Fair, which
I thought was both successful and quite enjoyable. Successful in that
there seemed to be at least one person in every one of my lectures who
seemed to take something from them. I like reaching out and being able
to touch people like that. I like being able to share ideas and
inspirations. I am in the relatively lucky position to be able to work
in and around photography and photographers pretty much every day of
the week. I get to see and experience quite a bit more than the average
photo enthusiast. I realize this, so I like to try to pass along the
knowledge I accumulate as often as I can.<br />
<br />
I also try to do this because I meet a lot of photographers who have
become seasoned and veteran, or professional, and suddenly they don't
have the time or patience for what they feel are questions undeserving
of their time. They get asked questions by people new to photography
and they scoff or shrug or give a pat answer. Important questions like:<br />
<br />
Is 1/60th more or less exposure than 1/125th?<br />
<br />
What is an f-stop?  How is that different from an aperture?<br />
<br />
The rule of thirds?  The Golden mean?  Power points?<br />
<br />
What does 5 megapixels mean?<br />
<br />
They seem simple and obvious to many of us now. Sure, easy enough once
you have learned the material. But I deal with photographers on a
weekly basis who struggle with remembering the relationship between
opening up your aperture, gaining more exposure and losing depth of
field. It seems so second-nature that many of us forget how challenging
this information was at first. I remember starting on a Pentax K1000
with absolutely no idea of how or what apertures were. My initial
working knowledge was simply this: by rotating the aperture ring, I
made the floating needle in the meter go up and down,and all I wanted
to do was put it in the middle. <br />
<br />
That was it. Stop. I had no concept of DoF. Or even of the numbers
1.8-22. They meant nothing to me. But I learned and now they do.<br />
<br />
And this is what I try to remind myself daily. That at one point I was
there. Every single one of you was too. I was asking these questions at
one point myself, and relying on people with the willingness and
patience to explain them to me. Sure I checked out a lot of books and
did a lot of reading. I learned a lot on my own from experimenting. But
at the same time I learned a lot from other photographers who were
willing to share their knowledge too.<br />
<br />
And I know a lot of others who are still generous with their time and
energy. I know a lot who have forgotten their roots and hence cannot be
bothered to help those beneath them.<br />
<br />
I don't claim to know exactly why some people do this. I know some just
don't have the patience for it (an odd thing for a photographer to
claim, considering how important patience is in photography, at least
good photography). Thankfully I meet very few people of this nature,
because they get under my skin. Talking to them, you get the impression
that they slipped out of the womb AP photographer of the year. Or the
world's last master fine art landscape photographer. <br />
<br />
I guess many of you will say it is an ego thing. And I agree. It is.
Remembering one's humble beginnings and admitting to them is
contradictory to mainting a topnotch ego.<br />
<br />
I gave five lectures over two days this weekend. I did it for free,
simply out of the enjoyment of it. It is one of the reasons I tend to
write at such length here on Flickr. I enjoy the sharing. I realize
that I have more to offer than just what my images encapsulate. As do
many, if not most, other photographers out there. Another thing I
realize though is that I am not as good as I can be. That photography
is a voyage without any real end or pinnacle. At least I hope not. I
like constantly striving to improve and expand my photography. <br />
<br />
And one of the ways to make one's self better is by helping make all those around you better too. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br />By: <a href="http://www.bluemooncamera.com/">Zeb Andrews</a> <i>(USA)</i> ©2008<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><br /><i>Photo: Nikon FM2, 100mm f2.8 with 50mm f1.8, reversed lenses</i></font><br /><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><br /><b>COPYRIGHT NOTICE</b><br />Copyright © Zeb Andrews. All rights reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock. <br />Use without written consent by the author (Zeb Andrews) is illegal and punishable by law.</font><br /><br /></div><div align="left"><br /></div></div></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>chicago 7/31/08 by Gary Isaacs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thiaps.com/words/2008/09/gary-isaacs.html" />
    <id>tag:www.thiaps.com,2008:/words//12.95</id>

    <published>2008-09-04T06:48:05Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-15T09:14:13Z</updated>

    <summary> chicago 7/31/08iwas living in boston and was supposed to let my doctor know any time that i was planning on going out of town. One night ceilia called to say that she and Kevin were driving to Chicago and that i should come along. They picked me up the next day in her battered red beetle with the oval rear window. i had the back seat all to my self. i watched the scenery, slept and made sandwiches. i don&apos;t remember too much about the first part of the trip. i remember we stopped to watch a small town...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Frans Peter Verheyen</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thiaps.com/words/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="gary isaacs.jpg" src="http://www.thiaps.com/words/images/gary%20isaacs.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="497" width="500" /></span> <div><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>chicago 7/31/08</b><br /><br /></font>iwas living in boston and was supposed to let my doctor know any time that i was planning on going out of town.<br />
One night ceilia called to say that she and Kevin were driving to Chicago and that i should come along. <br />
They picked me up the next day in her battered red beetle with the oval
rear window. i had the back seat all to my self. i watched the scenery,
slept and made sandwiches.<br />
i don't remember too much about the first part of the trip. i remember
we stopped to watch a small town parade and that further along we were
tail gating a big 18 wheeler that turned into a giant manta ray which
flapped it's wings and effortlessly arced away from the road when we
finally got too close.<br />
i slept on and off and enjoyed the vibration of the window against my face.<br />
And then there was the part where i woke to the absence of motion. We
were pulled over. Ceilia and Kevin said i should stay with the car and
they'd return with gas. i went back to sleep and woke again feeling
light, refreshed and wanting to stretch.<br />
i circled the car a few times and then headed up the road. It was
woodsy and as idyllic as the cover of a coffee table book. i walked and
walked. i'm not a great whistler but i remember that was the feeling of
it. i cut through a field with big black and white spotty cows. i
crossed some train tracks. More fields. i kept being able to find the
same stone i had kicked so many times i finally lost the count.
Eventually i needed to rest and just laid down in the magic of the day.<br /><br />
When i woke up i didn't feel quite so good as i had, but not so bad
either. The sun wasn't where i'd seen it last and it had cooled off a
bit. i wasn't positive which way was back.<br />
Okay. i'll go this way and if i don't hit the train tracks i'll go the
other. But that got weird cause even after i had walked a long long way
without reaching the tracks i still had the feeling they could be up
ahead. And on top of that the truth was that i'd seen everything the
way i had just come and really didn't want to see it for a second or
third time - something in me just didn't want to turn around - i felt
like i was done with everything in that direction.<br />
The next thing that happened was "significant". i bent down to tie a
shoe lace that had come loose. In my life discovering an untied shoe
lace ALWAYS means something is about to happen. i bent down wondering
what it would be.<br />
It was a big station wagon driven by this couple with two kids. They
pulled over and asked if everything was alright and did i need a ride?<br /><br />
i sat in back with the kids. Turns out they were locals and it was the
first Saturday of the month which was their day to have diner at their
favorite restaurant attached to the service station not far away. It
was a family tradition and i was welcomed to join them. Their treat.<br />
i saw the bible up on the dashboard but they never mentioned it. They
were just plain sweet. i awoke to the little boy tugging on my shirt.
We were there.<br />
The menu was like what you would have imagined. i was tempted by the
spaghetti plate but went with an ice cream sundae. the mother's brow
momentarily knit but she softened right away. The kids were talkative
which was making it easy on me. And then two things happened at once.<br />
The waitress rounded into the isle and i could see my sundae coming in
a fancy glass bowl with five inches of whipped cream and a cherry.
Whoa! And - simultaneously i thought i heard someone call my name.<br />
<br />
There at the cash register by the entrance was ceilia and Kevin.<br />
<br />
Ceilia got to the table fast. "where the fuck have you been? We've been looking for you all day".<br />
<br />
Everyone at the table winced with that. i didn't know what to say.<br />
<br />
"come on man we gotta go now!"<br />
<br />
the waitress had arrived with my sundae and i was torn, i felt conflicted and at the same time sort of sleepy.<br />
<br />
The mother spoke. "you can take it with you. We know the owners and it'll be okay".<br />
<br />
i will never forget her eyes.<br />
<br />
And then i was in the back seat again. Only now ceilia and Kevin
weren't talking to me. They were acting like i wasn't there. Which
actually made it easier for me to enjoy my ice cream.<br />
<br />
 i woke up  in Chicago. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />By: <a href="http://www.garyisaacs.com/">Gary Isaacs</a> <i>(USA)</i>&nbsp; ©2008 <br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Photo: <i>Leica M2 , 35mm sumicron, Tri-x</i><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><b>COPYRIGHT NOTICE</b><br />Copyright © Gary Isaacs. All rights reserved. This photo is not to be used as free stock. <br />Use without written consent by the author (Gary Isaacs) is illegal and punishable by law.<br /></font> <!-- ############## COMMENTS -->
	
						<h3><br /></h3><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

